NASA’S Orion Project Refutes Apollo Moon “Landings”

“A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” – Mark Twain

NASA’S Orion Project Refutes Apollo Moon “Landings”

Pic Source: "BREAKING NEWS: NASA admits it still hasn't figured out Van Allen Radiation Belts!" - 3/18/15 -

Pic Source: “BREAKING NEWS: NASA admits it still hasn’t figured out Van Allen Radiation Belts!” – 3/18/15 –

The attrition passage of time exposes lies and liars. Deception always has a leg-up on truth’s reality. That’s because it chooses the “‘coin toss’ time” and rigs the temporary alleged reality, outcome. And, once the propaganda is publicly disseminated, truth is left behind to accomplish its reality catch-up.

Such has been last Century’s NASA Apollo moon “landing” sagas. That grandiose (Flash Gordon-type) outer space deception, has been repeatedly refuted by those who logically connect the many sensible dots. One large “dot” was (and continues to be) the physical barrier of the scorching life-decimating Van Allen Radiation Belts, of which physical phenomenon reality, was discovered following the Apollo moon landing theatrical production.

Pic of "Ming the Merciless." He was a protagonist character in the (pre-Star Trek) "Flash Gordon" TV series of last Century. Both TV series (Flash Gordon and Star Trek) featured outer space travel and "new worlds." These televised series, along with "Star Wars"-type productions, helped to memorerize / propagandize and pre-condition world-wide populations to believe and accept current U.S. Government NASA malarkey. Pic source:

Pic of “Ming the Merciless.” He was an evil protagonist character in the (pre-Star Trek) “Flash Gordon” TV series of last Century. Both TV series (Flash Gordon and Star Trek) featured outer space travel and “new worlds.” These televised series, along with “Star Wars”-type productions, helped to mesmorize / propagandize and pre-condition world-wide populations to believe and accept current U.S. Government NASA malarkey. Pic source:

Note the short video below. It features a young (supposed) NASA “engineer” relating about NASA’S Orion space trip project. Hear the substance of what he says and put 2 and 2 together. As a spokesman for NASA, he essentially refutes last Century’s alleged Apollo spaceship trips to the moon and back.

Video excepts:

“NASA ‘Engineer'” – ………”As we get further away from earth, we’ll pass through the Van Allen Belts; an area of dangerous radiation……..”

Video author – ……..Dangerous radiation that the Apollo mission flew through unshielded apparently……..Couldn’t they just use the technology from the Apollo missions or the same “shielding” as it must have worked back in 69′ ??……..

………..Wait, WHAT?, “We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space”…….Ummmm, didn’t we do that in 69′, apparently not!…………

NASA engineer admits they can’t get past the Van Allen Belts –

 Source of above video: Superformance72 –

Related Informational Links:

More related informational links:

NASA Deception –


“A thinking person will question what he hears; examine what he sees; and evaluate what others would have him believe.”

“When did big government and its mainstream media tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?”

[Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel] 


Posted by:

Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel

23 thoughts on “NASA’S Orion Project Refutes Apollo Moon “Landings”

  1. Douglas says:

    I have two comments.

    1. NASA allegedly took 10,000 [ten thousand] photos on the surface of the moon.

    Out of those 10K photos not one astronaut’s face appears. [All they had to do was flip up the sun-visor on their helmet and snap a shot. They could have even done this very easily in the shade.] I think I know why there’s no portrait shots. They were never on the moon but sitting comfortably in low earth orbit, waiting to land back on earth. Some researchers claim they never even took off for low-earth orbit. The people you see bouncing around on the ”moon” were government actors on a moon movie set directed by Stanley Kubrick of space movie fame.

    2. [a] Seven perfect soft landings and take-offs from the moon. All of that was 230,000 miles from earth…and not even one practice landing or death. What a world-class feat!!!

    [b] Consider the much later Space Shuttle – low earth orbit of 200 miles at most. Fourteen horrific deaths to astronauts. The entire program was scrapped due to it being considered dangerously unsafe.

    So we have to believe that in 1969 we can fly to the moon perfectly yet cannot manage to conduct safe flight in low-earth orbit over 20 years later. Did NASA get stupid or did they fake all of the moon landings and could barely make it much later at 200 miles out .

    You, dear reader, tell which one was a fraud….a or b.

    1. Douglas –

      Thank your for your spot-on comment! It was you who sent me something 2-4 years back that influenced me to verify NASA’S alleged moon landings. It did not take me long and I logically concluded that NASA had been lying all the time. And, I’m a more informed person for admitting I’d been wrong all these years assuming what was tossed my way was, reality. Thank you, again!

      Getting back to your response. I think you make an excellent point by your [a] and [b] proposition!

      As to the 14 “deaths” I would have to interject, “alleged” “deaths.” Why should we believe NASA when it has repeatedly lied to the whole world. Believing NASA would be like presumably believing our current White House ID forgery fraud!

    2. timez draggen says:

      First off the ISS is Hollywood junk it does not exist in space. Proof the earth is not a spinning ball. Spinning east a thousand miles per hour. Eastbound flight at less than a thousand mph would not be possible. The atmosphere would be moving a thousand mph. How could a bird fly west against that? Unless the earth is a closed system. If it is, what is it made of? How could rockets escape and return? Are satellites in or out of it? To prove what is, one simply proves what it is not.

      As for the shuttle, I witnessed a launch. There is no way it went more than five miles up. Why, with our technology there is zero start to docking footage, because it never happened. More NASA fraud. There are plenty of you tube videos showing the alleged shuttle crashtronots to be alive.

      As many times as NASA has lied how is anything believable? Not proof, but convincing enough for me. I personally don’t believe the van Allen belts are anything more than putting an image in your mind. More indoctrination into the blue marble cult, as most were from birth.

      Anybody questions anything is usually mocked or ridiculed, the new science questions, forbidden. Must be peer reviewed by the crony system in place. Just because the boy cries wolf, doesn’t mean there ain’t a wolf. It just means the boy is crying again.

  2. timez draggen says:

    If they lied about the moon trips, what makes you think the Van Allen belts are themselves not a lie. For that matter anything that they claim is not a lie. If the earth is a ball spinning a thousand mph to the east, how is it possible to fly east at less than a thousand mph. Closed system. How is it closed? What is it made of? How did they get rockets out of the closed system (satellites also)? The problem is no one can question without ridicule. Nasa is pure fraud. Blue marble cult indoctrination starts early.

    1. timez draggen –

      Excellent questions and conclusion.

      I think that government controlled academic education accomplishes 2 things:

      1) It teaches early “indoctrination” as you say, starting out with the “Blue marble cult” propaganda.

      2) It teaches the very young not to question, think, examine and evaluate.

    2. Douglas says:

      Interesting comments. You can drive a car east with no problem. Your car does not have to be going 1000 MPH to go east or west or any direction. All we need to do is consider the basic physics of motion relative to another body in motion.

      1. Douglas –

        So? Doesn’t “that” (alone) lend credence to “staionary earth” that terra firma is not spinning at 1,000 MPH at the equator and 66X that, in a fixed rotating motion?

        1. Douglas says:

          If the Earth stopped spinning suddenly, the atmosphere would still be in motion with the Earth’s original 1100 mile per hour rotation speed at the equator.
          All of the land masses would be scoured clean of anything not attached to bedrock. This means rocks, topsoil, trees, buildings, you and so on, would be swept away into the atmosphere.

          1. Douglas –

            Oh. So you are one that actually believes the standard “scientific” saga story line; that earth not only spins but also swiftly rotates around the Sun at the same time? What I hear you saying is that if the earth did not rotate at some 60,000 mph, that all which you said in your comment would transpire? I’m asking for some clarification of your comment.

          2. Douglas says:

            The idea that the spherical earth is stationary and flat started out as a joke on the internet.

            I’ve flown several times to Australia. When I left California it was winter….when I arrived in Sydney it was summertime. The flight was 7,500 miles and took about 15 hours. At 30,000 feet you can look out the plane window and see that the earth is round…very round.

            I had a great trip…highly recommended for anyone.

          3. Douglas –

            So, what I read you saying, is that the earth is round but not spherical, according to your sensory sight airliner flight experience?

          4. Douglas says:

            I say the earth is spherical…a round sphere, so to speak… a child’s beach ball. I could be wrong but I believe the Space Shuttle photos revealed the planet to be a round sphere. I believe the moon is also a round sphere.

            I’ve never been to Tokyo but I do believe that it exists in a country called Japan. I know people who have been there and they all say that its a real place. Call me crazy but I believe them.

            Italian man of science Galileo Galilei said the earth is round and the Catholic Pope placed him in house arrest. I’d hate to have to redo the Renaissance again…one time was enough.

            I think that most educated people say the earth is a round sphere.

            There’s a planetarium here in Los Angeles. The Director Dr. E. C. Krupp says the earth is a round sphere…I’ll side with him for now. I hope that he is not arrested for saying the earth is a round sphere. Is prison and torture in his future? Who knows.

          5. Douglas –

            Hardly ever do I disagree with your intelligent assessments when you comment. I also remember when you submitted a comment to Moralmatters that basically stated that this website offers straight answers. [That’s my paraphrase version]

            However, having stated the above, I’ll have to respectfully disagree with you on this issue. You, apparently, are going by what your senses tell you. I, also do, but have different criteria, obviously.

            I do appreciate the reality that you don’t accept, hook, line and sinker what NASA tosses the world. Notice, that I did not say “globe.” [aka, “ball earth]

            Thank you, as always.

          6. timez draggen says:

            That is assuming that it is spinning in the first place. How can a butterfly go west at all against an atmosphere hurling east a thousand mph? The answer, given by science. A closed system.

            As in a car traveling and the air inside is moving at the speed of the vehicle. Last I checked, that car has a steel and glass enclosure. What could be surrounding a spinning ball to enclose the earth? And how do rockets escape and return such a closed system. My answer is, they don’t, and never have.

            Additionally humans are very sensitive to motion, do you feel like you’re on a moving object? “We hold these truths to be self evident”. Oceans that stay in place yet rivers flow freely. Why don’t you fall off the bottom? Gravity is theoretical; never proven.

  3. J. says:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *