Cruz Confusion Versus The U.S. Constitution

Please note portions of the following excellent commentary. They explain the reality fallout of a possible Ted Cruz run for the U. S. Presidency. JB Williams essentially highlights the embraced false reality which many Americans possess regarding Cruz’s illegitimate quest to ascend to the U.S. Office of Chief Executive. 

Also note: The highlighting in blue by this Moralmatters author: 

The End of the American Presidency – By JB Williams –


Senator Ted Cruz is not the purist Conservative angel that many of his complacent followers would have him be. He was dishonest withTexas voters and now he is working over the American public with an attempted run for the U.S. Presidency.

Senator Ted Cruz is not the purist Conservative angel that many of his complacent followers would have him be. He was dishonest with Texas voters and now he is working over the American public with an attempted illegitimate run for the U.S. Presidency. Pic source –

………..That’s when calls for him to seek the Oval Office in 2016 started to take shape, and that’s when Sen. Ted Cruz became very concerned about a fact that he knew, but had never disclosed to the public, including during his Senate campaign a year earlier… Ted Cruz was born a Canadian citizen at birth, and remained a legal citizen of Canada, all the way up until May 14, 2014.

In short, Sen. Ted Cruz was a legal citizen of Canada when he ran for and became a U.S. Senator, without ever having disclosed his Canadian citizenship to Texas voters, which under both Texas and U.S. Election law, is an act of fraud. Ted Cruz had committed election fraud by failing to disclose to Texas voters that he was a Canadian citizen in 2012.

No one can say for certain, but I think it is a very fair guess, that had Ted Cruz disclosed to Texas voters in 2012, that he had always been and remained at that time a legal citizen of Canada, his Republican opponent, Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst, would have won that race and become the next U.S. Senator from Texas.

Ted made a huge mistake… He messed with Texas!…….

……….On August 18, 2013 the Dallas Morning News published a copy of the birth records released by Sen. Ted Cruz, his Canadian birth records. The story opened the debate over Cruz eligibility for the Oval Office and unlike Obama, who had issued a number of forged certifications of live birth to support his eligibility claim, Cruz had just proven that he was a Canadian citizen at birth by releasing his Canadian birth record.

Many immediately scrambled for damage control, alleging that maybe he was a “dual citizen” at birth via his American born mother. But there were no U.S. documents supporting that claim to be found…

Enter the Harvard lawyers… the same lawyers that had been protecting Barack Hussein Obama for six years… Cruz was advised by his legal friends to immediately renounce his Canadian citizenship, which he did, on May 14, 2014…

…and by June of 2014, friends and supporters at Fox News were beginning to clear his path to the White House by floating the idea that Ted was now a natural born Citizen of the United States, based upon renouncing his Canadian citizenship.

Of course, two critical problems remained… Renouncing his Canadian citizenship affected his Canadian citizenship, but not his citizenship records in the United States, which so far, appear not to exist even today.

As Ronald Reagan would say, here we go again, with a freshman Senator, a Harvard Lawyer, with Harvard law friends and no U.S. documentation to prove that Ted Cruz is a U.S. citizen of any type. A man with known foreign origins, and the son of a Father, Rafael Cruz Sr. who was at no time in his life a legal citizen on the United States until 35 years after Ted’s birth in Canada, when he renounced his Canadian citizenship and naturalized to the United States in 2005.


It is a common practice of those who would pervert and molest the U.S. Constitution, not to differentiate between the “natural born citizen” status and the “naturalized citizen” status. Pic source – The Three Legged Stool Test for “natural born Citizen” of the United States to Constitutional Standards –

The problems were quite obvious… unlike Obama, who had taken great care to forge a false documented past before running for office, Ted had already proven to the world that he was not a natural born U.S. Citizen at birth, but rather a documented Canadian citizen at birth.

Not only had he committed election fraud by not disclosing to Texas voters that he was a Canadian citizen in 2012, now he was about to join Barack Hussein Obama in an even greater national effort to defraud all American voters by seeking the U.S. Oval Office less than a year after renouncing his Canadian citizenship……..

…….Enter the Harvard lawyers again… On March 11, 2015 – two Harvard law friends published a Harvard Law Review opinion declaring both Ted Cruz and Barack Hussein Obama “natural born Citizens” of the United States……..

………..What the Harvard experts are saying is this, gee, we just can’t find any documents to confirm the Founders intent of the term natural born Citizen, and so, we think it means this… a “citizen at birth” is a “natural born Citizen.”

Never mind that Harvard and Yale law buddies had already decided that “illegal aliens” are really just “undocumented citizens,” or that they long ago twisted naturalization laws to make “illegal aliens” born on U.S. soil “anchor babies” who are also considered to be “citizens at birth.”

The legal experts have now expanded all of our naturalization terms to mean “natural born Citizen,” using naturalization amendments, cases and statues to do it. In so doing, they are eliminating the true meaning and purpose of the Article II natural born Citizen requirement from our Constitution without having to endure the cumbersome process of actually amending the Constitutional legally…………

……..The people have allowed the lawyers to amend the Constitution by simply publishing a legal opinion.

………And today, we are witnessing the death of the American Presidency… from this point forward, any person born anywhere on earth to any foreign Father or Mother can be president of the United States in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution……..

……….Now, what does natural born Citizen really mean and why did our Founder’s choose that term in an overt effort to prevent people like Barack Obama, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Vladimir Putin and bin Laden’s son from ever gaining access to the Oval Office?

The answer is found in the Founders statements identifying the source of the term, Vattel’s international treatise on Natural Law, The Law of Nations, book 1 – Chapter XIX. Every American can easily find it, read it, understand it and know it. There is nothing at all ambiguous about it… unless you let your political agenda drive your facts.

The true definition of the natural born Citizen requirement for the Oval Office as described throughout the entirety of Chapter XIX can be summed up in this section from 212……….

……..Nothing pertaining to naturalization pertains to natural born, nothing. Naturalization is the process by which an alien (non-citizen) becomes an American citizen.

Natural born Citizenship is a Natural Law term describing a condition that either exists or does not exist at the moment of birth. There is nothing anyone can do to become a natural born Citizen, once they were not born a natural born Citizen. Lies offered by Ivy League lawyers to the contrary are offered with the explicit intent to alter the Founder’s intent, and once again, they know it… It is a Common Law practice they all learned in law school. Common Law is the legal British practice of openly subverting Constitutional Law.

So, people with no U.S. documentation, “undocumented citizens” according to Ivy League lawyers, are “natural born Citizens” and average citizens must rely upon Ivy League Law experts (or judges, political appointees) to help Americans figure out what the true meaning of “is” is… a term the average American is not intelligent enough to figure out for themselves. This is not a new tactic, Hitler did it with the help of Goebbels, Marx did it, Castro did it, Stalin and Lenin did it, even Hugo Chavez did it…

This Moralmatters author doesn't doubt some “Conservatives” personal sincerity. But, they are like a guilty do nothing on-looker watching a child walk onto a railroad track as the train rounds the bend. These Obama criminal co-conspiratorial enablers are guilty of grievous political sins of omission.

If allowed to succeed, again, the American people will have participated in the end of the American Presidency. Their silence will be their consent…

That is the worst part of this entire saga in the demise of the United States… The people put their politics ahead of their Constitution and as a result, they are about to let it all slip away, their freedom and liberty, all of it.

The mission to globalize the United States is only possible once it is no longer a requirement that only a True American, a natural born Citizen, can hold the office of Commander-in-Chief. The people appear willing to accept this now. –

– JB Williams

Related to the above:

The Three Legged Stool Test for “natural born Citizen” of the United States to Constitutional Standards –



“A thinking person will question what he hears; examine what he sees; and evaluate what others would have him believe.”

“When did big government and its mainstream media tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?”

[Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel] 


Contacting Congress – A Citizen’s Congressional Directory — CALL YOUR CONGRESSMAN

2014 SENATE ELECTIONS – The Battle For Capital Hill —

Posted by:

Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel


Featured pic of Ted Cruz snake:

Senator Ted Cruz –

6 thoughts on “Cruz Confusion Versus The U.S. Constitution

  1. Joel Lillo says:

    All of this is moot since there is no way in hell that Ted Cruz is going to get the nomination. It’s either going to be Jeb Bush (shudder) or Scott Walker (YAY!!!!!!!).

    1. Joel –

      I would still think it is important that Americans know why Cruz doesn’t Constitutionally qualify. Ignorance of America’s Constitution can never be a good thing.

      As to your assessment, that it’s either going to be Hillary admirer, Jeb Bush, or Gov. Scott Walker, I agree with you choice of Walker. Of all the possible (winnable) candidates, Walker is the one I think would be the best choice.

  2. Kim Gibson says:

    Will SOMEONE please challenge his eligibility please? He’s NOT eligible, period! It’s getting tiring arguing with cruzbots, obamabots, ignorants, trolls, shills, etc!

    1. Kim –

      I agree with you. But, unfortunately, I don’t see anyone with stature going all out to oppose this Republican usurper. Donald Trump may be the only possibility. At least he is the only one I can think of at the present.

  3. Lucretia Borgia says:

    O’Bammy was legally challenged on eligibility more than 200 times. How’d that work out for lovers of the Constitution.

    1. Lucretia –

      Not well. It only goes to illustrate the corruption and intimidation which flows from the presidential office, down.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *