Oct 182014

The following reported news is another example of the evil of  “political correctness” and the false tenet of  “multiculturalism,” of which principle declares that all values [except Christian values] have equal value. It is also a clear example of societal and cultural discrimination against Christians:


Homosexual activists who attempt to force Christians to accept and conform to their anti-Scriptural lifestyle, are essentially, hate mongers. Hate is not only conveyed in speech but in actions which attempt to force upon individuals that which is considered disagreeable and against one’s conscience. Homosexual activists which utilize the legal system against fellow Americans to accept their lifestyle, showcase themselves to be rabid immoral hate mongers.

Christian Businessman Told to Leave Faith at Home and Take Diversity Training – thenewamerican.com

In a shocking decision, a commission examiner made a recommended ruling last Monday that a Christian businessman violated a local ordinance against sexual-orientation discrimination by refusing to print T-shirts with a pro-homosexual message……..

………Many critics point out that this raises the matter of double standards. They might ask, would a Jewish businessman be forced to print a pro-Palestinian message on a shirt, a Muslim one to print a pro-Zionist message, or a homosexual one to print Leviticus 20:13 (a passage condemning homosexual behavior) on a shirt? Others will say that while homosexuals are a “protected class,” Palestinian activists, Zionists, and Christians are not. One might then wonder, however, does this make them “unprotected”?

Of course, if the government acknowledged that this is a matter of messages, not messengers, it couldn’t legislate in this area without violating the First Amendment. But since it’s applying a standard that conflates the message and the messengers, a critic might wonder how offering different legal protections to different groups can be allowed under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment…………

………Regardless, many find a “landmark decision” mandating what they would call “re-education” by a government bureaucracy worrisome. As Starnes put it, “Take just a moment and let that sink in — a Christian business owner is being ordered to attend diversity training — because of his religious beliefs. That’s a pretty frightening concept and a mighty dangerous precedent.”


Related informational links to the above:


Why Divine Revelation (Scripture) condemns homosexuality. Why do homosexual activists become so upset when their lifestyle is called into question? – thechristianmessage.org

Help for Homosexuals – moralmatters.org


More Americans are beginning to realize the forensic facts of aka Obama's criminal ID fraud,  even though Congress members remain complacently   silent. They make themselves criminal accomplices, allowing aka Obama to remain in office.

More Americans are beginning to realize the forensic facts of aka Obama’s criminal ID fraud, even though Congress members remain complacently silent. They make themselves criminal accomplices, allowing aka Obama to remain in office.

Also note —  Perhaps, the most extensive of government / media propaganda criminal behavior. We have, functioning as our nation’s chief executive an “undocumented worker,” [criminal ID fraud] who arrived there by deception, stealth and subterfuge:


Contacting Congress — A Citizen’s Congressional Directory — CALL YOUR CONGRESSMAN 

2014 SENATE ELECTIONS — The Battle For Capital Hill — http://www.electionprojection.com/2014-elections/2014-senate-elections.php


“A thinking person will question what he hears; examine what he sees; and evaluate what others would have him believe.”

“When did big government and its mainstream media tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?”

[Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel] 

Posted by:

Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel




Pic attribution for featured pic

  6 Responses to “First Amendment Rights Only Apply At Home: Okay For Public Molestation By Homosexual Activists”

  1. Go to the re-education camp and flunk it.

    That’s what I’d do.

  2. Here is a solution to these same sex folks demanding service from individuals that do not agree with their choice in life. What you need to do is agree to do the job then price the job or item outrageously over what you normally charge. When taken to court for over charging you simply say that you needed the higher price to pay for bringing in non religious workers to perform the job.

    Make sure you do bring in folks that are non religious or hold no beliefs so you can show you had an additional expense in fulfilling the order. Anything over an above what it costs you to bring in extra workers is your profit and no one can say how much profit you can make. It is what you quote if they do not want to pay the higher price they can go elsewhere, in the meantime if they take the offer and you get the job look at the profit you made and yet you physically did not have to handle the item(s).

  3. Kentucky? I thought this happened only in the People’s Republic of California!

    • durabo –

      Yes. I’m happy that you point this out! And, now that I think of it, I ask the question:

      “Where is Senator Mitch McConnell to defend this Christian businessman?”

      I think that we all know the answer to the above question – at least those of us who know why the Republican Party is so ineffectual. Umpteen GOP politicians such as McConnell have sold out to [good] moral values and are only interested in securing their own legislative seats of influence and power. They have long since departed from legislating and defending what is good for America and Americans and now [sorrily] serve the cultural gods of political correctness and multiculturalism!

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>