Americans would be wise to discard Obama’s smokescreen storyline that his mother was Stanley Ann Dunham and that she is dead

Pic of "Elizabeth Duke" as seen at fbi.gov/ - Investigative researcher continues to expose Obama's family origins. Note her latest posted article: To Nab or Not to Nab: Our F.B.I. Knows "Dukes" Current Identity, And Exactly Where To Find Her

Pic of “Elizabeth Duke” as seen at fbi.gov/ – Investigative researcher, Martha Trowbridge, continues to expose Obama’s family origins. Note her latest posted article: To Nab or Not to Nab: Our F.B.I. Knows “Dukes” Current Identity, And Exactly Where To Find Her

Americans would be wise to discard Obama’s smokescreen storyline that his mother was Stanley Ann Dunham and that she is dead

Rank in file Americas still have not grasped the deception of our present White House occupier – aka, Barack Obama. Else if they did, they would not believe his “Dreams” book smokescreen storyline. This author quotes from a recent past article:

Obama’s real father: Forget what you have already been told

Excerpt:

……..Discard what Obama said about his origins, as described in his “Dreams of My Father” book

This author will be very short and frank with you now. It is common knowledge that what Obama has said and continues to say, cannot be treasured more than a hill of beans. Obama possesses the dastardly diabolical habit of speaking with a forked tongue. He is a masterful snake oil salesman. He is a stranger to the truth. He speaks repeated lies, so much so, that this deceptions seem to always possess a smoke screen specific purpose. His lies are intended to deflect what are his true and ongoing actions and agenda.

And, this author’s contention is, that Obama lied about his past family origins. Sadly and pathetically, though, that deception has been readily accepted as the temporal truth. How many people do you know who have accepted the Obama story line about his Hawaiian origins with a Kenyan father, Barack Obama I, and white mother, Stanley Ann Dunham? Virtually most people believe that, because that’s all they’ve been told. And, of course, that’s what the mainstream media has reported, over and over………

The worst part of Obama’s position as US White House Executive is that he outright lied to the American people. We have a leader who, according to the US Constitution, is mandated to provide for this country’s inhabitants, security. That is a president’s first and foremost responsibility. The all too infamous, New York politician, Anthony Weiner, now only knows too well, that credibility is the measurement which depends upon his being elected to the position of New York City’s mayor. In like manner, it is deplorable that Americans don’t witness and recognize the credibility disconnect regarding Obama’s continued White House false pretense [usurping] occupation.

Lying is a nasty and oftentimes (life and death) practice. The Scriptures cosign to hell, those who are lifestyle liars. That divine revelation author hates lies and lying ; else He would not make sure that lifestyle liars will pass from this life to the hereafter in a condition of hellish damnation forever torment.

Human relationships are based upon telling the truth. Marriage between husband and wife very seldom survive a lifestyle practice of one spouse lying to the other. Normal human communication, business agreements and contracts – and a host of other human interactions, are all based upon honesty and truthfulness.

Truthfulness and reality are often recognized as one and the same. American consumers would never dream of buying a new automobile and experience falling to their collapsed floorboard road, dragged to death. Yet, Americans (by and large) don’t seem to grasp the monster personality of deception in the White House, who currently has passed himself off as “Barack Obama.” Americans – especially the majority of the black community have not come to terms with Obama’s ID frauds – even in the face and crystal clear testimony of the ongoing Sheriff Arpaio’s investigative findings that Obama has passed himself off as someone other than what he is.

America: You’ve been lied to. You continue to be lied to – by none other than the man who promised you a government of complete transparency!

It is obvious that Obama wishes to smoke screen his past. He continues to play the race card making the unfortunate death of Trayvon Martin a focal point to gin up his racial agitating. Obama wishes to hide his past background and the reality of the formal and completed investigation by Sheriff Arpaio which has proven Obama's ID fraud.

It is obvious that Obama wishes to smoke screen his past. He continues to play the race card making the unfortunate death of Trayvon Martin a focal point to gin up his racial agitating. Obama wishes to hide his past background and the reality of the formal and completed investigation by Sheriff Arpaio which has proven Obama’s ID fraud.

Americans voted for Obama. A vote is a personal contract. Obama has molested every individual vote by his lying deceits. By virtue of Obama defrauding the American voter; our contract with him is null and void. Because he lied to us from the git-go in order to secure from Americans their votes; everything that has been enacted during his White House occupation has to be deemed null and void. Obama’s appointments, executive orders and signed legislation must be revoked and discarded. Simply said: Obama’s White House occupation was gained by gross false pretense. He is worse than a traitor.

Related:

To Nab or Not to Nab: Our F.B.I. Knows “Dukes” Current Identity, And Exactly Where To Find Her 

Dreams From Obama’s Mother: F.B.I. Most Wanted Fugitive Domestic Terrorist Elizabeth Ann Duke – by Martha Trowbridge

Please also note this website’s related articles:

Please note Montgomery Blair Sibley's interesting and intelligent related article - and his website: "AMO PROBOS" - REFLECTIONS ON THE GROWTH OF LEGAL TYRANTS AND A JUSTICE SYSTEM WHICH HAS EVOLVED TO THREATEN -- RATHER THAN PROTECT -- OUR LIBERTY

Please note Montgomery Blair Sibley’s  related excerpted article to the left of this page – and his website: “AMO PROBOS” – REFLECTIONS ON THE GROWTH OF LEGAL TYRANTS AND A JUSTICE SYSTEM WHICH HAS EVOLVED TO THREATEN — RATHER THAN PROTECT — OUR LIBERTY

Please also note:

Ask yourself and try to connect some important dots: Why would Obama be interested in dismissing an indictment against Elizabeth Duke?

Obama Dismisses Indictment Against Fugitive Bombing Terrorist – Is Tsarnaev’s Indictment to be Dismissed Next? – amoprobos.blogspot.com/2013/07/

Excerpt:

Lost to the memory of most, Elizabeth Duke was indicted on May 11, 1988, along with six other individuals for acts of violence against the United States, including the bombing of the United States Capitol on November 7, 1983. A fuller description of the Indictment is contained in the United States Attorney’s 1988 Press Release regarding the Indictment. If you want to put Elizabeth Duke’s Indictment in historical context, I suggest The Evolution of a Modern Domestic Terrorist Group by James E. Wilson. After her arrest in 1985 in Pennsylvania, Elizabeth Duke was released on $300,000 bail over the strenuous objections of the United States Attorney. She subsequently failed to re-appear as ordered and a fugitive bench warrant was issued for her arrest………. – amoprobos.blogspot.com/2013/07/ 

______________________________________________________

Please note 3 important informational links:

Election Projection – The Battle for Capitol Hill – 2012 Senate – electionprojection.com/2012elections/

The Complete List of Email Addresses and Fax Numbers for the U.S. Congress and Governors – conservativeusa.org/

U.S. Constitution Online – usconstitution.net/

_______________________________

Posted by:

Nathan M. Bickel

http://www.thechristianmessage.org/

http://moralmatters.org/

Note:  Above pics and / or videos found on the web.

24 thoughts on “Americans would be wise to discard Obama’s smokescreen storyline that his mother was Stanley Ann Dunham and that she is dead

  1. GREAT ARTICLE. Are you saying his mother is Elizabeth Ann Duke & that she is still alive? Are you also implying that Malcolm X is Barry’s dad? I have thought that for years.

  2. If you can do a morphing photo of Mister Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah/Bounel into the known children of Frank Marshall Davis the resemblance would be demonstrated to be undeniable. I’m convinced that he’s the Baby Daddy. We know that he lived there in Hawaii where Barry’s purported mother did some pornographic photography work. Dr. Corsi reports on the writings of Mr. Davis where he refers to some white chick he was screwing that points rather strongly to Ms. Dunham. We know that Davis mentored (if not molested!) young Bath House Barry. Perhaps he molested the young bastard child and introduced him to the life-style that Barry became famous for in the bath houses of Chicago and among the homosexual members of the choir in the so-called “reverend” Wright’s–but oh so wrong-‘black liberation theology’ (read Marxist ideological dissemination center) “church.” The ultimate irony is that the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa is only using the Liberal-socialists (read Marxist operatives) as a means to his Islamic world domination end.

    How can a homo like Barry be a Muslim?” you ask: Much like delusional Liberals, Muslims contort the meaning of words and don’t really consider a Muslim raping a woman as rape, or sodomizing a man, or a camel for that matter, as being “gay” or perverted. All such behavior is sanctioned by Islamic doctrines and tenets. Islam is evil–pure evil. It does not deserve to be extended the freedom of religion codified within the American constitutional republic experiment in government of the people.

    1. Chris –

      I am familiar with the claim of some that Obama’s appearance resembles that of Frank Marshall Davis. I have also read Corsi’s book. He too, bases much of what he says on Obama’s storyline which was created some years back when Obama was to write a book about something totally different. As I mentioned in my Moralmatters article:

      And, this author’s contention is, that Obama lied about his past family origins. Sadly and pathetically, though, that deception has been readily accepted as the temporal truth. How many people do you know who have accepted the Obama story line about his Hawaiian origins with a Kenyan father, Barack Obama I, and white mother, Stanley Ann Dunham? Virtually most people believe that, because that’s all they’ve been told. And, of course, that’s what the mainstream media has reported, over and over………

      Furthermore, Corsi is a journalist. He has gone where certain writings and “reported” news have led him. On the other hand, Investigative researcher, Martha Trowbridge, is, what she is. She is an investigative researcher willing to examine, analyze and look beyond the normally accepted Obama storyline. In short, I believe Trowbridge’s investigative findings, rather than the Obama storyline and various people who spawn their ideas about Obama off Obama’s own words. You know as well as most, that Obama’s words are cheap and full of deceptive propaganda.

    2. There is no “Stanley Ann Dunham” as presented by The Obama Campaign; her bio is fabricated. She is Spun Lies. The “Obama” Conspiracy needed a mother for their synthetic candidate “BHO II”. “Stanley Ann” is who they invented.

      Any conclusions based upon details presented by the conspirators about “SAD” are de facto false.

  3. I agree that Obama hides his history at so much cost, only because it is all lies. I don’t see his resemblance to Frank Marshall Davis but certainly see it very strongly in Malcolm X. Of course their paths also met over the years, as they both lived in Indonesia at the same time.

    I also think Stanley Ann is a fake – conveniently dead so as not to be a problem. When Obama’s white grandparent was at death’s door, he had a problem of going to Hawaii to say goodbye. I doubt that was anything near truth either. He probably never met them. When someone lies as readily as Obama, there is actually nothing that you can believe.

    1. purplewings123 –

      You stated, and I must say, “Spot on:!”

      “……When someone lies as readily as Obama, there is actually nothing that you can believe.”

      Yet, sadly, pathetically and tragically many Americans did and continue to accept Obama’s storyline; not only about his origins, but what he currently says and does to dismantle traditional, patriotic and Constitutional America:

      Obama’s lies the State of the Union Address and Americans who love Obama’s lies
      http://moralmatters.org/2013/02/12/obamas-lies-the-state-of-the-union-address-and-americans-who-love-obamas-lies/

  4. Beckerhead says:

    The problem is that there is no evidence.. Its all speculation.

    1. Beckerhead –

      You left no evidence to substantiate your generalizing one liner. Your conclusion is speculation on your part.

  5. Delores Holt says:

    When I was reading all the investigated reports about his past last year, I saw a picture of him as a young boy being teased by a woman in lingerie; (the picture of her is the same as the one they say is her mother). They said the picture was taken in Davis’s house where he ran some kind of photogenic operation.

    1. More like pornographic operation!

  6. cmblake6 says:

    Reblogged this on Cmblake6's Weblog and commented:
    This is an absolutely fascinating theory, could well be true. Remember, a theory is only a theory until proven to be a fact. Evidence is vital to that proof, and I’d love to see some of that! ANYTHING to get rid of this miserable gay Marxist Muslim POS. ANYTHING!

  7. cmblake6 says:

    LOVE IT! Now if we just had absolute rock solid proof, maybe we could do something with it.

    1. cmblake6 –

      Proof oftentimes is of a subjective nature. Evidence it not. It is objective. There is enough evidence out there that if there was a benevolent US Military coup; Obama and Hillary would be prime candidates for a military court and subsequent incarceration………

      1. cmblake6 says:

        Nathan M. Bickel :
        cmblake6 –
        Proof oftentimes is of a subjective nature. Evidence it not. It is objective. There is enough evidence out there that if there was a benevolent US Military coup; Obama and Hillary would be prime candidates for a military court and subsequent incarceration………

        Incarceration? I seem to remember the penalty for treason, or espionage, goes a bit further than that.

        1. cmblake6 –

          Yes. I agree. Seems as if I forgot another “alternative.” The worst US prison would be too good for Obama.

          While we are on the subject – I see one other possible alternative:

          If it were possible for Obama to do so; it would be an interesting and challenging proposition which would include him and his treasonous cabal,
          to be spared the death penalty in exchange for Obama to give up his hold of usurping power at the White House. Added to that quiet exit would be Obama signing a bona fide executive order rescinding and revoking all his previous executive orders, appointments and signed legislation. And, of course added to all that, there would have to be a complete confession of his ID frauds.

          But, how to accomplish the aforementioned? That is the question. It is oftentimes easy to come up with a solution; which reminds me of a story my father would tell:

          During WWII Will Rogers (the famous American humorist) was asked: “What would you propose to rid the oceans of the German U-2 (submarine) boats which are sinking allied cargo vessels and military warships?”

          Will Rogers responded: “Drain the oceans so that the allied forces can pop off the German attack vessels with their aircraft.”

          To that question and answer, Will Rogers was then asked:

          “How do you propose to exact the draining of the the oceans to pop off the German U-2 attack ships?”

          Rogers then replied:

          “You asked me the solution to the massive problem; you didn’t ask me [initially] how to implement it.”

  8. poetopoet says:

    This is not a “Smokescreen”! Because no biological mother would ever deny their God given child, as Stanley Ann Dunham did, when she refilled for her USA passport, she never acknowledged the child called Barry Soetoro or Barack Insane Obama, as hers, for she denied his name to be put her U.S. Passport. Even Rosemary’s baby was acknowledged, by its biological mother, unlike Obama’s deception of motherhood, spurn by Mrs. Soetoro!

    1. poetopoet –

      Thank you for visiting moralmatters.org and for your comment!

      In response to your scenario; I would have to state that you are basing it upon some of the outgrowth of Obama’s storyline. To do so is a risky proposition. How can an honest person take what Obama has said, seriously? I do hope that you can recognize Obama as the pathological liar he is.

  9. cmblake6 says:

    I went over to that “Terrible Truth” site, and two thoughts arose. Why would it be better for his manufactured father to be a British Muslim Communist, in the case of it’s background story, which would then make it ineligible under Art 2.1.5? For yet another smoke screen to draw thought away from Malcolm X possibly, in order to avoid that political football? And, it’s books were written by Bill Ayers anyway. Was HE thinking this far ahead?

    1. cmblake6 –

      I’m not sure what you are attempting to convey; your comment (to me) seems somewhat ambiguous. Also, it seems as if you are attempting to maintain the Obama “Dreams” storyline so as to buttress the birther contention.

      But, be that as it may, I’m sure that Trowbridge in her Terrible Truth website is going where the evidence leads. She is not one who wishes to hue to a “birther position” which must have Obama’s birth status as a foreign citizen to exclude him from the legitimacy of the American presidency by virtue of the Constitutional “natural born citizen” clause.

  10. The problem with trusting Obama is everything. The only things I believe out of him was when he said “My Islamic faith’, and ‘My homeland, Kenya’. Oh, yeah, when he said he doesn’t ‘like the Constitution, and want to do away with it.’ Or when he said he doesn’t like or trust White people, even his own Grandmother. Or when he ridiculed Jesus and the Bible-that’s what he believes.
    On other words, there’s not much out the mouth of De PreZ we can believe. .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *