Perhaps, the judge should be limiting herself from the pre-trial mainstream media stereotype which first reported the unfortunate death of Trayvon Martin, as a racist act of bigoted violence by George Zimmerman? Where are limits and parameters placed upon judges in our US system of justice? Who and what gives them the right to suppress background evidence and play games with juries?
Has the judge placed any limits upon the prosecution attorney? Or, because Trayvon Martin was young, apparently irresponsible and smoking pot; – is that justification to discriminate against George Zimmerman? Are there no limits to political correctness in American courtrooms?
Please note the news piece excerpt following the pic:
<<<<<<<<< …….A Florida judge has placed limits on what George Zimmerman’s lawyer can say about the 17-year-old he fatally shot during the neighborhood watch leader’s murder trial next month.
Circuit Judge Debra Nelson ruled Tuesday that Zimmerman’s attorney won’t be able to mention Trayvon Martin’s marijuana use, his suspension from school and his past fighting during opening statements.
The judge also ruled that some of the Martin’s texts and other social media statements won’t be allowed in opening statements, though some of his personal material could be allowed later depending on how the case progresses.
Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara, told the judge that Martin’s marijuana use and past fighting was central to the argument that Zimmerman used self-defense when he confronted Martin last year at a gated community in Sanford, Fla. Zimmerman is charged with second-degree murder. He has pleaded not guilty.
“We have a lot of evidence that marijuana use had something to do with the event,” O’Mara said. “It could have affected his behavior.” ……. >>>>>>>>>> – http://news.yahoo.com/judge-jurors-cant-see-crime-scene-martin-case-143106948.html
Note – The following link provides contact information to our nation’s top political personalities.They are the elected leaders:
Note: Pics and / or videos found on the web.