Sandy Hook: The Real Conspiracy Theorists by Dr. Ronald J. Polland
Moralmatters.org is pleased to publish the following informational commentary by Dr. Ronald J. Polland.
Please note at the commentary’s end, [scroll down] some important information about this extraordinary author. Pics and captions have been provided by this Moralmatters.org author.
SANDY HOOK DEFINITELY KNOWN ABOUT IN ADVANCE OF ITS OCCURRENCE
Put aside the typical cries of “conspiracy theory” by the Left who use the term “conspiracy theory” in the same way that all these Muslim Brotherhood front groups (like CAIR and ISNA) use “Islamophobia.” They are intended to squelch all discussion about the subject of the term.
You can take it to the bank that, when two or more leaders of any left-wing organization discuss unethical ways of effecting social or political change, you have a conspiracy taking place, not a strategic planning session. Vote fraud is a conspiracy. The people committing vote fraud call its discovery a “conspiracy theory.” Gun-running to criminals or insurgents is a conspiracy. Covering up a crime is a conspiracy. Those involved with the crime, whether it was Fast & Furious, Gunwalker, Tripolior , Cairo, will scream “conspiracy theory” when accused.
During the same week as Sandy Hook, there were 15 practice scenarios, training exercises, and mass shooter simulations scheduled to take place in the same school district as Sandy Hook.
The first things they said about the incident were that three people were injured in a shooting and were on their way to a hospital.
Then we heard that there were no survivors.
They said that there were two or three shooters. Adam Lanza was said to jump the barricade at the front door manned by a guard.
That did not fly, so they changed it to Lanza shooting out a steel mesh reinforced window to get it.
OK, sounds like a great photo-op. There was no photo-op. In fact there were no photos or video shown at all that would validate any mass shooting had taken place, let alone a mass murder. No broken glass. No bullet holes in walls and doors. No casings from the 9 mm and .40 cal handguns found; just .223 casings – mentioned by an unknown source. Were the casings even fired? Did the reporter pick one up to tell if it had been fired? NO. It looks for all the world that the .223 casings were put there. Put where? In a pool of blood? In a crime scene that had not been roped off. A crime scene that had not been cleared?
No, they were dumped there to validate the lie that a Bushmaster AR-15 was used because that is the caliber used by the AR-15 and hundreds of other rifles for sporting, target practice, self-defense, and yes, in the military in a slightly different height known as NATO 5.56 mm. This is the most ubiquitous and popular rifle round in the world. There is no way to tell with the naked eye what fired that bullet casing. I’M not even sure that the actual weapon can be ID’ed. If a bullet slug was actually found out of the “hundreds” of rounds some woman said she heard (but that none of the kids heard), then they would have been able to possibly ID the gun that was nowhere to be found. It allegedly belonged to his mother. He could have compared the casings to any ammo she had left. BUT, nothing was done to verify that Lanza had her guns. Missing guns do not prove their existence in a school house.
That [story] changed to a single shooter.
They said he was the son of a teacher at the school. His mom was not a teacher at the school
They had diagrams and names of the guns allegedly found on the scene before they even found a single bullet hole. They specifically named a long gun as a Bushmaster AR-15, a Glock 17, and a Sig-Sauer. They said this all before they had any reliable information on what happened. There was no Bushmaster AR-15 anywhere near Sandy Hook. There was no Bushmaster anything at Sandy Hook. There was no AR=15 style anything at Sandy Hook. There were no assault rifles or assault weapons anywhere inside or outside Sandy Hook. ALL of the news media agreed that they found four handguns and no long gun. They did find a shotgun in a locked trunk that was never removed from the trunk and never fired. So, how can the Sandy Hook people and the media continue to say, along with Diane Lying Feinstein, that she wants to ban the kind of assault rifle used at Sandy Hook?
That bill I am all for. BAN the assault rifle used at Sandy Hook because there was nothing there. There was no AR-15 there. There was no assault rifle there. There was no long gun there. There was nothing like an assault rifle. So, I DO support the banning of NOTHING because NOTHING resembling forensic evidence was found, or if found, was never released.
CBS flat-out lied twice tonight. First by contining the assault rifle canard, but more egregious was showing an M15 in full auto mode. Fully automatic weapons were banned in 1986. It is illegal to own an automatic weapon, even if it has selectable fire where it can be a semi-automatic: one pull of the trigger – one bullet.
Tonight on CBS news they showed one pull of the trigger and 30 rounds fired in two seconds. >>>>>>>> - Dr. Ronald J. Pollard
Publications by the above commentary author – Dr. Ronald J. Polland:
Dr. Polland’s Facebook Page:
Related to the above commentary:
- LiveLeak.com – Sandy Hook – The Illusion of More People - liveleak.com - Here is the answer for those saying that there would have to be A LOT of people involved in a hoax like this. ORIGINAL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrXPHwl11io UNCUT HELI FOOTAGE: http://www.yo/
- Does Robbie Parker have a back ground beyond his alias used in this videohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKWgCRBR5qE
Please note the 3 following important informational links – The first two – source info. for our deaf and dumb political leaders. Contact them, if you will; but don’t hold your breath:
Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel
Note: Above pic (s) found on the web