Supreme Court Justice Roberts has a golden opportunity to depose Obama: Guest Commentary
“Supreme Court Justice Roberts has a golden opportunity to depose Obama” by Chris Farrell
In light of the fact that Chief Justice Roberts has referred the case, (12A606) “Edward Noonan et al., v The Calif. Sec. of State, Deborah Bowen,” to a full conference to be held on February 15th, the perfect opportunity to defeat the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa’s assault on the 2nd Amendment is at hand.
‘The best defense is a good offense!” The Chief Justice must be persuaded to take up the case and render a decision which retro-actively abrogates the illegal election of a constitutionally ineligible candidate who fraudulently represented himself as eligible to be president. Even now Mr. Obama proceeds in a cover-up of unparalleled magnitude forging official documents and paying law firms millions of dollars to keep his true background hidden.
Consider the following: Could Chief Justice Roberts have been defensively posturing for the blow-back, the “black-lash” if you please, of a decision he may have realized would be necessary to make in the future on Mr. Obama’s purported constitutional eligibility when he ruled so surprisingly on Obamacare?
Could the Chief Justice be about to shock the Hell out of the world and rule against Obama as being constitutionally eligible to be president on February 15, 2013?
In the hope that this albeit far-fetched scenario is a possibility, is the NRA or the Republican Party making any effort to promote such a decision by the Supreme Court which would be the best outcome in defense of the Second Amendment?
Might not the Chief Justice have been positioning himself and the Supreme Court as apparently not being antagonistically inclined towards Mr. Obama so as to insulate them both from certain to arise liberal charges of racism should a decision need to be rendered by the court on the issue of constitutional eligibility which would pronounce that Mr. Obama is not now and never has been eligible to be president?
If, after considering the evidence submitted to the Supreme Court in multiple cases which the court has turned down, the Chief Justice found it necessary to consider various paths that the Supreme Court eventually might have to take in defense of the Constitution, could the Chief Justice have strategically planned to first rule in favor of Obamacare—as a tax—knowing that such a ruling would theatrically demonstrate an apparent support for Obama—or, at the very least, demonstrate no prejudice towards the man—while still leaving Obamacare open to state by state dismantling until such time as a ruling on Mr. Obama’s eligibility would remove the law retro-actively as having been passed while Mr. Obama was in the commission of crimes and, most importantly, act as the perfect disclaimer to angry liberal entities which would scream “Racism!” as they rallied liberal-socialist Obama supporters to advance ‘Forward’ towards anything but “civil” disobedience should the Supreme Court retro-actively abrogate the illegal election of the constitutionally ineligible fraud and forger, Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack ‘King Hussein’ Obama Jr., the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa, a.k.a. Soebarkha, a.k.a. Harrison J. Bounel for having taken place while in the commission of a crime?
Will the Chief Justice permit the two Supreme Court Justices appointed by Mr. Obama, (or whatever his legal name, the name written on his original long form birth certificate—not to be confused with the electronic file released by the White House in 2011 which has been proven beyond any shadow of a doubt to be a poorly constructed forgery), to participate in hearing the case surrounding the issue of eligibility when their conflict of interest could not be greater? Their very appointments would too necessarily have to be retro-actively abrogated—effectively annulled—as they were made while Mr. Obama was in the commission of the criminal usurpation of the office of the president of the United States concomitant with the military rank and authority of commander-in-chief.
The Republican Party is so far removed from where it should stand in defense of our Article II of our Constitution, that on Jan. 16th, Senator Marco Rubio said, “President Obama’s frustration with our republic and the way it works doesn’t give him license to ignore the Constitution.” Keep in mind that this comment was made by a man who himself is constitutionally ineligible to be president or vice-president–not being a natural-born citizen as required by the Constitution—yet he made a concerted effort, licentiously ignoring the Constitution, to be the V.P. running mate for Republican nominee Mitt Romney in 2012—and is even now touted by many within the Republican Party as a potential presidential candidate in 2016! Perhaps the NRA and the Republican Party should come out with an itemized list of those parts of the Constitution they deem worthy of defending and those parts that they do not.
No IMPEACHMENT shall suffice; for to impeach the fraud it would first be necessary to acknowledge his legitimate, legal occupation of the presidency which is not now and has never been the case. “Crazy” Joe Biden is an accomplice in the crime. It would make no sense to replace one criminal with another.
Since Mr. Obama fraudulently represented himself as constitutionally eligible to be president when he ran–both times–then he is not now and has never been president. He was in the commission of a crime when he was twice illegally elected. The fraud should be taken into custody, and since he also usurped the military rank of commander-in-chief, he should face a military tribunal and face either a firing squad or the gallows for having criminally usurped the office of the presidency, the most horrendous crime against the American experiment in ‘government of the People’ in our nation’s history. All those complicit in Mr. Obama’s crimes must be brought to justice if liberty is to be preserved.
At this point in time, the question of whether or not Mr. Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency shall be addressed by the proper authorities is completely in the hands of God and Chief Justice Roberts. ‘In God we trust.’
Breaking News! Chief Justice Of The Supreme Court John Roberts Schedules a Case by Attorney Taitz Regarding Obama’s Forged IDS To Be Heard In Conference Before The Full Supreme Court - obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/01/
Also Related: Some articles from this website about Obama’s “ineligible status:”
Please note 3 important informational links:
Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel