Obama’s greater lie: And a likely motive for his Benghazi cover-up scandal lie
It is the contention of some that Obama lied to the American people when he repeatedly took the credit for Osama Bin Laden’s [supposed] demise. This author says, “Supposed,” for three reasons. First, there were previous reports of Bin Laden’s [previous] death. Secondly, Obama and his operatives provided no substantial forensic evidence that the Pakistan US Seal raid had actually and conclusively taken down Bin Laden. Thirdly, Obama dispensed with the (supposed) Al-Qaeda’ leader’s body, speedily and in such a manner, as to deny any future investigation and / or confirmation of the Obama assassination narrative. Please note: Evidence Now Suggests Obama Did Not Have Osama Bin Laden Killed – nowtheendbegins.com/
Then, once all this (supposedly) took place according to Obama’s directive, America and the world began to hear Obama remind them, that he had tracked down the world’s most infamous terrorist and sent him on his eternal journey. In the backdrop of all of this Obama narrative, has been Obama claiming that Bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda’ terrorist organization was on the run and barely surviving.
It is, no wonder then, that Obama would spread the flagrant lie of an anti Islamic video and spontaneous uprising, precipitating the Benghazi terrorist attack, which left 4 Americans dead; among whom, was Ambassador, Chris Stevens. Obama’s directive to spread this flagrant video [narrative]lie, was so imperative, that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, Sec. of Defense Leon Panetta and UN Ambassador Susan Rice, all stood by their Pied Piper, White House occupier, liar. This gave the Obama presidential campaign time to speed itself to Election Day before the truth about Obama’s attempted Benghazi scandal cover-up would soon become more media, widespread.
And, so, the greater lie in the background of the smokescreen video lie, [supposedly] sparking (causing) a spontaneous Muslim terrorist attack on the Benghazi consulate, is the lie which Obama desired to protect. But, why? Is it because (according to some reports) Obama wanted to keep under wraps his secretive “gun running” activity to Islamic terrorists, among whom are multiplying Al-Quaeda’ terrorists, – a major contradiction to his deceptive Bin Laden kill, narrative? Why won’t Obama be forthcoming? Also, didn’t Obama say in the past that if the political winds would change, he would stand by his Muslim brothers?
Those who love traditional and patriotic America: It is time to cease giving Barack Hussein Obama the benefit of any doubt. There is much now known about Obama’s background and loyalties, than to seriously think of him (anymore) as a loyal American. He’s lied repeatedly to the American people from the beginning, about his real identity. And, this whole Benghazi cover-up scandal illustrates that Obama continues on his pathological lying path.
The following has been found on the web. It offers a very likely motive for Obama’s continued Benghazi cover-up scandal. I believe that no other scenario best fits, as to explain why our White House occupier has not been honest and forthright with the American people:
>>>>>>>>> According to sources in the State Department and the CIA, and intercepted communications from the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama “staged” the attack in Benghazi in order to create a monumental “October Surprise” that would guarantee him re-election.
Yes, you read that right, and no, I’m not making this up. Obama, we now know, is and has been working with the Muslim Brotherhood secretly to engineer the release of the “Blind Sheik,” Omar Abdel Rahman, the mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center attack.
In Obama’s October Surprise, he intentionally set up the consulate to have no security so that Chris Stevens could be kidnapped, and held for ransom by Al-Qaeda (and the Muslim Brotherhood). Then, several days before the election, the plan was to trade Chris Stevens for the Blind Sheik, making himself look like a hero, and all but guaranteeing re-election.
This was one of the top reasons why Obama was so insistent on the Muslim Brotherhood getting $1.2 Billion in U.S. Aid. They were to have a primary role in getting Obama re-elected. That is why, even though they knew days before the attack that it was going to occur, no effort was made to bolster security. It was intended to be non-existent. The Libyan security forces were intended to quietly slip into the night when the attack began. And they did, just as planned. That is why, even though 2 C-130U gunships, which were built SPECIFICALLY for this kind of attack, and which could have saved the lives of our people there and were a mere 45 minutes away, were never scrambled at any time during the attack.
There was to be no resistance whatsoever. That is why there were not one, but TWO armed drones flying over the consulate during the conflagration… our CIA operatives on the ground were painting targets because they knew air cover was available. That is why, even though requesting support and backup three times, their requests were NOT ignored, but were intentionally, specifically DENIED three times, and they were told to “stand down,” which basically means to “surrender.” That was part of Obama’s plan.
They were not to fight back. That would potentially undermine the kidnapping effort and cause unnecessary “complications.” That is why, even though the CIA operatives and ex-Navy Seals were on the ground, providing real-time reports, and even though they were “lighting up” the source of the mortars attacking the compound with lasers, no gunships or support ever came. They weren’t supposed to resist.
That wasn’t “part of the plan.” It also wasn’t part of the plan for one of the CIA operatives to intentionally defy Obama’s orders, and who rescued the body of Sean Smith and then stood up again, and engaged the enemy who was attacking American soil. It was supposed to be “clean.” Quick. Efficient
Kidnap the Ambassador and get out. Then Save The Day in the “nick of time.” They didn’t factor in a tiny group of highly trained ex-Navy Seals/CIA operatives… American Patriots and heroes. Even though they eventually lost their lives in the firefight, they managed to employ the full measure of their skills, and took out over 80 attackers in the process… which enraged the attackers, who were led to believe that they would encounter no resistance.
THAT is why Ambassador Stevens was raped (sodomized), murdered, and dragged through the streets. In their warped minds, they believed that they had been betrayed by the U.S. yet again. They believed that Obama was their friend. They believed that they were going to get their beloved Blind Sheik back. And yet, here were 80 of their own… dead by American hands.
Obama was asked directly in an interview if he denied their request for assistance, he refused to answer, and instead droned on with a canned response promising to “bring those responsible to justice.
“Former CIA and State Dept. personnel are coming out now with damning evidence that indicts President Obama, and reveals the truth about what is going on. Hillary Clinton, who is now openly laying the blame at the feet of the President, after falling on her sword in a premature show of loyalty for the Administration.
The “Video” defense was carefully crafted WEEKS in advance, to explain the attack. If this doesn’t outrage you, If you are not moved enough to contact your congressman about this, you are not worthy of your citizenship. <<<<<<<<<<
Related: Moralmatters.org web page of blog articles that have followed the Benghazi Cover-up Scandal:
- Democratic National Convention nominates serial liar, sex offender and extortion expert – moralmatters.org/2012/09/07/
Posted by: Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel
Please note for future voting consideration reference:
- Election Projection – The Battle for Capitol Hill – 2012 Senate – electionprojection.com/2012elections/
- The Complete List of Email Addresses and Fax Numbers for the U.S. Congress and Governors – conservativeusa.org/
- U.S. Constitution Online – usconstitution.net/
Note: Above picture (s) found on the web