Nov 172012
 

United States UN Ambassador Susan Rice: One of Obama’s principle Benghazi cover-up scandal surrogates. Look at her pic. Although she is personally responsible and accountable for lying; she like others, marched to the deceptive “video narrative” by our Muslim bent White House occupier. View the mesmerized look.

It is the contention of some that Obama lied to the American people when he repeatedly took the credit for Osama Bin Laden’s [supposed] demise. This author says, “Supposed,” for three reasons. First, there were previous reports of Bin Laden’s [previous] death. Secondly, Obama and his operatives provided no substantial forensic evidence that the Pakistan US Seal raid had actually and conclusively taken down Bin Laden. Thirdly, Obama dispensed with the (supposed) Al-Qaeda’ leader’s body, speedily and in such a manner, as to deny any future investigation and / or confirmation of the Obama assassination narrative. Please note:  Evidence Now Suggests Obama Did Not Have Osama Bin Laden Killed – nowtheendbegins.com/

Then, once all this (supposedly) took place according to Obama’s directive, America and the world began to hear Obama remind them, that he had tracked down the world’s most infamous terrorist and sent him on his eternal journey. In the backdrop of all of this Obama narrative, has been Obama claiming that Bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda’ terrorist organization was on the run and barely surviving.

It is, no wonder then, that Obama would spread the flagrant lie of an anti Islamic video and spontaneous uprising, precipitating the Benghazi terrorist attack, which left 4 Americans dead; among whom, was Ambassador, Chris Stevens. Obama’s  directive to spread this flagrant video [narrative]lie, was so imperative, that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, Sec. of Defense Leon Panetta and UN Ambassador Susan Rice, all stood by their Pied Piper,  White House occupier, liar. This gave the Obama presidential campaign time to speed itself to Election Day before the truth about Obama’s attempted Benghazi scandal cover-up would soon become more media, widespread.

All pathological liars eventually get caught in the web of their own deceptions. Scandal ridden Obama is no exception.

And, so, the greater lie in the background of the smokescreen video lie, [supposedly] sparking (causing) a spontaneous Muslim terrorist attack on the Benghazi consulate, is the lie which Obama desired to protect. But, why? Is it because (according to some reports) Obama wanted to keep under  wraps his secretive “gun running” activity to Islamic terrorists, among whom are multiplying Al-Quaeda’ terrorists, – a major contradiction to his deceptive Bin Laden kill, narrative? Why won’t Obama be forthcoming? Also,  didn’t Obama say in the past that if the political winds would change, he would stand by his Muslim brothers?

Those who love traditional and patriotic America: It is time to cease giving Barack Hussein Obama the benefit of any doubt. There is much now known about Obama’s background and loyalties, than to seriously think of him (anymore) as a loyal American. He’s lied repeatedly to the American people from the beginning, about his real identity.  And, this whole Benghazi cover-up scandal illustrates that Obama continues on his pathological lying path.

The following has been found on the web. It offers a very likely motive for Obama’s continued Benghazi cover-up scandal. I believe that no other scenario best fits, as to explain why our White House occupier has not been honest and forthright with the American people:

>>>>>>>>> According to sources in the State Department and the CIA, and intercepted communications from the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama “staged” the attack in Benghazi in order to create a monumental “October Surprise” that would guarantee him re-election.

Yes, you read that right, and no, I’m not making this up. Obama, we now know, is and has been working with the Muslim Brotherhood secretly to engineer the release of the “Blind Sheik,” Omar Abdel Rahman, the mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center attack.

In Obama’s October Surprise, he intentionally set up the consulate to have no security so that Chris Stevens could be kidnapped, and held for ransom by Al-Qaeda (and the Muslim Brotherhood). Then, several days before the election, the plan was to trade Chris Stevens for the Blind Sheik, making himself look like a hero, and all but guaranteeing re-election.

This was one of the top reasons why Obama was so insistent on the Muslim Brotherhood getting $1.2 Billion in U.S. Aid. They were to have a primary role in getting Obama re-elected. That is why, even though they knew days before the attack that it was going to occur, no effort was made to bolster security. It was intended to be non-existent. The Libyan security forces were intended to quietly slip into the night when the attack began. And they did, just as planned. That is why, even though 2 C-130U gunships, which were built SPECIFICALLY for this kind of attack, and which could have saved the lives of our people there and were a mere 45 minutes away, were never scrambled at any time during the attack.

During Obama’s recent press conference, he was apparently more concerned about his lying surrogate, United States UN Ambassador Susan Rice, than he was of the 4 Americans he did not attempt to rescue during the several hour Benghazi terrorist attack.

There was to be no resistance whatsoever. That is why there were not one, but TWO armed drones flying over the consulate during the conflagration… our CIA operatives on the ground were painting targets because they knew air cover was available. That is why, even though requesting support and backup three times, their requests were NOT ignored, but were intentionally, specifically DENIED three times, and they were told to “stand down,” which basically means to “surrender.” That was part of Obama’s plan.

They were not to fight back. That would potentially undermine the kidnapping effort and cause unnecessary “complications.” That is why, even though the CIA operatives and ex-Navy Seals were on the ground, providing real-time reports, and even though they were “lighting up” the source of the mortars attacking the compound with lasers, no gunships or support ever came. They weren’t supposed to resist.

That wasn’t “part of the plan.” It also wasn’t part of the plan for one of the CIA operatives to intentionally defy Obama’s orders, and who rescued the body of Sean Smith and then stood up again, and engaged the enemy who was attacking American soil. It was supposed to be “clean.” Quick. Efficient

When Obama and Sec. of State Hillary Clinton presided over the solemn ceremony of the 4 terrorist slain Americans; their body language had “guilty as hell” all written over them.

Kidnap the Ambassador and get out. Then Save The Day in the “nick of time.” They didn’t factor in a tiny group of highly trained ex-Navy Seals/CIA operatives… American Patriots and heroes. Even though they eventually lost their lives in the firefight, they managed to employ the full measure of their skills, and took out over 80 attackers in the process… which enraged the attackers, who were led to believe that they would encounter no resistance.

THAT is why Ambassador Stevens was raped (sodomized), murdered, and dragged through the streets. In their warped minds, they believed that they had been betrayed by the U.S. yet again. They believed that Obama was their friend. They believed that they were going to get their beloved Blind Sheik back. And yet, here were 80 of their own… dead by American hands.
Obama was asked directly in an interview if he denied their request for assistance, he refused to answer, and instead droned on with a canned response promising to “bring those responsible to justice.

“Former CIA and State Dept. personnel are coming out now with damning evidence that indicts President Obama, and reveals the truth about what is going on. Hillary Clinton, who is now openly laying the blame at the feet of the President, after falling on her sword in a premature show of loyalty for the Administration.

The “Video” defense was carefully crafted WEEKS in advance, to explain the attack. If this doesn’t outrage you, If you are not moved enough to contact your congressman about this, you are not worthy of your citizenship. <<<<<<<<<<

Related: Moralmatters.org web page of blog articles that have followed the Benghazi Cover-up Scandal:

Obama Benghazi Cover-up Scandal – moralmatters.org/

Also:

____________________________________________

Posted by:  Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel

Please note for future voting consideration reference:

Note:  Above picture (s) found on the web

  24 Responses to “Obama’s greater lie: And a likely motive for his Benghazi cover-up scandal lie”

  1. Out of a abundance of respect for you Nathan I will not say what I am thinking right now. WOW! My blood is boiling. As always excellent article.

  2. Indeed, this makes my blood boil. I have never seen such liers and criminals in my life. To think my husband and son both served this country and paid the supreme price. This entire administration will rot in hell.

  3. I just can not believe things have gone this far? This far with the whole Obama situation! Every one needs to wake up come together for America and get this guy out of here! With him being re-elected I am ashamed, out raged, and very sad… One day we are all going to wake up and realize its to late! Obama is a fraud… A evil man… That had his own personal agenda that does not benefit America or its people one bit, and I am afraid he will be the end of us all….

    • savannah –

      Your concerns are very legitimate and spot on! Your description of Obama being an “evil man,” is right on target. Those Americans who don’t recognize what you and I see; have their heads in the sand. They are of the misunderstanding that “evil” has to appear a certain way. All they see is Obama as a well meaning snake oil salesman.

  4. Me hate Obamma so much my blood boils. Great article as usual.

  5. [...] Obama’s greater lie: And a likely motive for his Benghazi cover-up scandal lie – moralmatter… [...]

  6. You mention the possibility that Osama bin Laden was already dead. I’ve heard that discussed many times.

    The most salient fact about the compound is that there was no medical equipment mentioned or shown. I got the impression that he had an incurable illness that would always require complex machinery.

    • Bruce -

      I think that the impression you received was correct. According to news reports, Bin Laden was suffering from deficient kidneys. Do a Google search and I’m sure that you will find some reports about his death before the Obama Bin Laden kill scam. One news report I remember was that the former female leader of Pakistan referred to a dead Bin Laden. I even did a short http://www.moralmatters.org blog posting on his supposed death by Obama:

      The Obama Bin Laden Kill Myth – Why?
      http://moralmatters.org/2012/06/03/the-obama-bin-laden-kill-myth-why/

      Thank you for visting. Please feel free to offer further comments as you hopefully will continue to visit this site.

  7. [...] Saturday – 11/17/12 – Obama’s greater lie: And a likely motive for his Benghazi cover-up scandal lie [...]

  8. [...] Obama’s greater lie: And a likely motive for his Benghazi cover-up scandal lie (moralmatters.org) [...]

  9. I agree 100 % and I have suspected this all along, they all need robe put up for treason, along with the liberal media who continue to be in the catbox covering shit up.

  10. Too bad all you haters of our current democratically elected government were not as outraged when GWB led us into two wars without a plan or a way to pay the spiraling costs.. How easily you forget that 6,000+ brave Americans have lost their lives, tens of thousands more suffer serious injuries due to the INCOMPETENCE of the simultaneous GOP-led invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq. YOU GIVE NO CREDIT TO OBAMA FOR GETTING US OUT OF THAT IRAQI HELL HOLE. But yet this terrible Benghazi attract is the end-all for you hypocrites.

    • Dawn -

      Your comment is a usual lib type rant. You make untruthful charges and don’t substantiate [evidence] your wild claims.

      You easily forget or intend to discount that the Iraqi War had both political parties involved. There was approval from some big political names on both sides of the political party aisle. G.W.Bush did not wander into that war with caviler behavior. Is recent American history that ancient for you to comprehend? Come now, your infatuation with our fraudulent White House undocumented occupier is showing through!

      Furthermore, your line of [indecent] argumentation is dishonest. You attempt to smoke screen the whole Obama Benghazi scandal and subsequent cover-up scandal with a false misrepresentation of history. Like Obama, you have apparently learned his conspiracy blame game, quite well.

      For you, I will be patient and recommend a prescription. Please follow it with consistency 24/7 until you have the gumption to take down your 2000 – 2008 wall calendars and replace them with some 2013 ones.

      Here’s the prescription to be repeated every 10 minutes of every waking hour:

      G.W.Bush is no longer president; Obama occupies the White House. He is now to be responsible and accountable.

      G.W.Bush is no longer president; Obama occupies the White House. He is now to be responsible and accountable.

      G.W.Bush is no longer president; Obama occupies the White House. He is now to be responsible and accountable.

      G.W.Bush is no longer president; Obama occupies the White House. He is now to be responsible and accountable.

      G.W.Bush is no longer president; Obama occupies the White House. He is now to be responsible and accountable.

      G.W.Bush is no longer president; Obama occupies the White House. He is now to be responsible and accountable.

      Finally, Dawn – after you have repeated this prescription formula enough times to get it through your thick head that you need not torture yourself with thinking that Obama is America’s savior; you need to haul out of your political correctness propaganda toy box, all your G.W.Bush dolls; pull out the pins; and lay them down to rest. Once having done so; I hope that you, yourself, can find some peace of undisturbed mind.

  11. Nathan, take a look in the mirror and read your passages aloud… You might as well be talking to yourself.

  12. Nathan, let’s take a moment to look at the names and the words of the Senators who defied bullying by Team Bush and had the wisdom and courage to vote “nay” on October 11, 2002.

    Here are the brave ones:

    Daniel Akaka (D-HI)
    Jeff Bingaman (D-NM)
    Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
    Robert Byrd (D-WV)
    Lincoln Chafee (R-RI)
    Kent Conrad (D-ND)
    Jon Corzine (D-NJ)
    Mark Dayton (D-MN)
    Richard Durbin (D-IL)
    Russell Feingold (D-WI)
    Robert Graham (D-FL)
    Daniel Inouye (D-HI)
    James Jeffords (I-VT)
    Edward Kennedy (D-MA)
    Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
    Carl Levin (D-MI)
    Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
    Patty Murray (D-WA)
    Jack Reed (D-RI)
    Paul Sarbanes (D-MD)
    Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
    Paul Wellstone (D-MN)
    Ron Wyden (D-OR)

  13. So Nathan, now I have provided you with only a fraction of the evidence that I have available to substantiate my claims. I could continue providing massive quantities of evidence that The Iraq war was the beginning of our county’s moral and economic downfall. But for some reason I suspect that you care not for the thousands of dead people who resulted from the Bush/Cheney leadership since its recent “history”. My apologies for bringing up a meaningful topic in the mist of your witch hunt.

  14. [...] opportunity to comment; followed by my gracious prescription for her. Apparently, as witnessed by her further comments, she has spurned the (healing) prescription [...]

  15. [...] Obama’s greater lie: And a likely motive for his Benghazi cover-up scandal lie (moralmatters.org) [...]

  16. [...] Obama’s greater lie: And a likely motive for his Benghazi cover-up scandal lie – moralmatters.org… [...]

 Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>