Nov 292012
 

Note to Moralmatters.org Readers:  After reading the following, I ask that you “weigh in” with your comments. This blog author has given “Dawn” an opportunity to comment; followed by my gracious prescription for her. Apparently, as witnessed by her further comments, she has spurned the (healing) prescription advice:

Obama’s snake oil must be getting stronger. That is this Moralmatters.org blog author’s opinion after hearing from one of Obama’s faithful mesmerized disciples. She registered a comment regurgitating Obama’s “Blame Bush” crybaby cat call. Isn’t it getting old?

Obama “Blame Bush” conspiracy theorist disciple, “Dawn,” has left a comment on the following moralmatters.org article:  Obama’s greater lie: And a likely motive for his Benghazi cover-up scandal lie

“Dawn’s” Comment:

Too bad all you haters of our current democratically elected government were not as outraged when GWB led us into two wars without a plan or a way to pay the spiraling costs.. How easily you forget that 6,000+ brave Americans have lost their lives, tens of thousands more suffer serious injuries due to the INCOMPETENCE of the simultaneous GOP-led invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq. YOU GIVE NO CREDIT TO OBAMA FOR GETTING US OUT OF THAT IRAQI HELL HOLE. But yet this terrible Benghazi attract is the end-all for you hypocrites.

Moralmatters.org Response (“Prescription”) Comment to Dawn – apparently gone, unheeded:

Dawn –

Your comment is a usual lib type rant. You make untruthful charges and don’t substantiate [evidence] your wild claims.

You easily forget or intend to discount that the Iraqi War had both political parties involved. There was approval from some big political names on both sides of the political party aisle. G.W.Bush did not wander into that war with caviler behavior. Is recent American history that ancient for you to comprehend? Come now, your infatuation with our fraudulent White House undocumented occupier is showing through!

Furthermore, your line of [indecent] argumentation is dishonest. You attempt to smoke screen the whole Obama Benghazi scandal and subsequent cover-up scandal with a false misrepresentation of history. Like Obama, you have apparently learned his conspiracy blame game, quite well.

Obama’s devoted followers all appear to be tightly connected to their leader. How does he do this? How does he get them to think alike?

For you, I will be patient and recommend a prescription. Please follow it with consistency 24/7 until you have the gumption to take down your 2000 – 2008 wall calendars and replace them with some 2013 ones.

Here’s the prescription to be repeated every 10 minutes of every waking hour:

G.W.Bush is no longer president; Obama occupies the White House. He is now to be responsible and accountable.

G.W.Bush is no longer president; Obama occupies the White House. He is now to be responsible and accountable.

G.W.Bush is no longer president; Obama occupies the White House. He is now to be responsible and accountable.

G.W.Bush is no longer president; Obama occupies the White House. He is now to be responsible and accountable.

G.W.Bush is no longer president; Obama occupies the White House. He is now to be responsible and accountable.

G.W.Bush is no longer president; Obama occupies the White House. He is now to be responsible and accountable.

Finally, Dawn – after you have repeated this prescription formula enough times to get it through your thick head that you need not torture yourself with thinking that Obama is America’s savior; you need to haul out of your political correctness propaganda toy box, all your G.W.Bush dolls; pull out the pins; and lay them down to rest. Once having done so; I hope that you, yourself, can find some peace of undisturbed mind.

Directly related to the above article:

Obama’s greater lie: And a likely motive for his Benghazi cover-up scandal lie – moralmatters.org/2012/11/17/

 ___________________________________________

Posted by:  Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel

Please note for future voting consideration reference:

Note:  Above picture (s) found on the web

Nov 282012
 

The human unhealthy desire to control other people is part and parcel of fallen human nature. The United Nations is an unhealthy environment to harness that malevolent control. Like minded nations with similar ideologies can form a destructive monopoly.

Whenever there is the possibility to raise money and control [something or other people]; the (so-called) “do-gooders” rise to the occasion. In the name of “security” and “protection” those self appointed (or otherwise appointed) elites and holier-than-thous will attempt to exert their massive and over-extending outreach.

And, whenever there is the possibility to raise money by taxing the already overburdened taxpayer and the poor, these socialites will do so. They have myopic minds and are fixated upon their own Utopian ideals and goals. What a kick in the face to the umpteen millions of Internet users whose only public voice they have as a restricted minority to be flooded with possible future UN Internet tax, control and censure!

Remember the old adage?

“The power to tax; is the power to control!”

U.N. to Seek Control of the Internet – weeklystandard.com/

Excerpt:

>>>>>>>> Next week the United Nations’ International Telecommunications Union will meet in Dubai to figure out how to control the Internet……….

History’s dictators have always been able to control their own country’s people by exercising full control of print and tele (public) communications.

……”Next week the ITU holds a negotiating conference in Dubai, and past months have brought many leaks of proposals for a new treaty…….”Having the Internet rewired by bureaucrats would be like handing a Stradivarius to a gorilla. The Internet is made up of 40,000 networks that interconnect among 425,000 global routes, cheaply and efficiently delivering messages and other digital content among more than two billion people around the world, with some 500,000 new users a day….

…….”Proposals for the new ITU treaty run to more than 200 pages. One idea is to apply the ITU’s long-distance telephone rules to the Internet by creating a ‘sender-party-pays’ rule. International phone calls include a fee from the originating country to the local phone company at the receiving end. Under a sender-pays approach, U.S.-based websites would pay a local network for each visitor from overseas, effectively taxing firms such as Google and Facebook. The idea is technically impractical because unlike phone networks, the Internet doesn’t recognize national borders. But authoritarians are pushing the tax, hoping their citizens will be cut off from U.S. websites that decide foreign visitors are too expensive to serve.” ……. <<<<<<<<<< – – weeklystandard.com/

Related:

Islamic terrorism – moralmatters.org/

Muslim leaders seek global blasphemy ban, limits on free speech – examiner.com/

EDITORIAL: The United (Muslim) Nations? – U.N. resolution gives special protection to Islamist regimes – washingtontimes.com/

 

The Future of the Global Muslim Population – Projections for 2010-2030 – pewforum.org/

How the Islamic states dominate the UN Human Rights Council – iheu.org/

 

 ___________________________________________

 

 

Posted by:  Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel

Please note for future voting consideration reference:

Note:  Above picture (s) found on the web