Patriotic Americans are wearied with Obama degrading and belittling America. He can’t call a terrorist attack for what it is. The most obvious of terror attacks on our own US soil (besides that of 9/11), took place on the Fort Hood military base; yet, our White House occupier would only designate it to be some “workplace violence.” Obama can’t seem to admit that America is under attack by Islamic Muslim terrorists. But, this should be no surprise for someone who bows to foreign leaders, spoke of his Muslim faith and who has voiced that the Muslim morning call to prayer is the sweetest sound that he has heard.
>>>>>>>> Barack Obama insisted in the presidential debate on Tuesday night that he had called the Benghazi attack an “act of terror” in his Rose Garden address the next day. Fact-checkers called shenanigans on that claim, but McClatchy notes that Obama did call it an “act of terror” the next day at campaign stops in Colorado and Nevada on September 13th. On the same day, the State Department refused to link the Benghazi attack to the YouTube video that media outlets like the New York Times and AFP had. Hillary Clinton called it a terrorist attack that evening.
However, the next day, things began to change, as McClatchy’s Hannah Allam and Jonathan S. Landay report in their in-depth look at how the narrative shifted toward the YouTube video instead of an al-Qaeda attack:
With images of besieged U.S. missions in the Middle East still leading the evening news, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney became the first official to back away from the earlier declaration that the Benghazi assault was a “complex attack” by extremists. Instead, Carney told reporters, authorities “have no information to suggest that it was a preplanned attack.” He added that there was no reason to think that the Benghazi attack wasn’t related to the video, given that the clip had sparked protests in many Muslim cities.
“The unrest that we’ve seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims, find offensive,” Carney said.
When pressed by reporters who pointed out evidence that the violence in Benghazi was preplanned, Carney said that “news reports” had speculated about the motive. He noted again that “the unrest around the region has been in response to this video.”
Carney then launched into remarks that read like talking points in defense of the U.S. decision to intervene in last year’s uprising against Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi: that post-Gadhafi Libya, he said, is “one of the more pro-American countries in the region,” that it’s led by a new government “that has just come out of a revolution,” and that the lack of security capabilities there “is not necessarily reflective of anything except for the remarkable transformation that’s been going on in the region.”
By that Sunday, Sept. 16, the evolution of the narrative was complete when Rice, the U.N. ambassador, showed up on all five major morning talk shows to make the most direct public connection yet between the Benghazi assault and the incendiary video…….. <<<<<<<< – hotair.com/
Also Related – Moralmatters.org commentaries with multiple informational links:
- Benghazi terrorist attack highlights a scandal-ridden Obama presidency – moralmatters.org/2012/10/11/
- Obama’s foreign policy farce: Gutless and anti-patriotic – moralmatters.org/2012/09/13/
- VP Presidential Debate divulges further Obama Benghazi scandal deception – moralmatters.org/2012/10/12/
More related links to the aforementioned mini commentary:
Obama Loves The Islamic Morning Call To Prayer – youtube.com/ – Note: watch at least the first minute and a half of this video.
Posted by: Nathan M. Bickel
Please note for future voting consideration reference:
- Election Projection – The Battle for Capitol Hill – 2012 Senate – electionprojection.com/2012elections/
- The Complete List of Email Addresses and Fax Numbers for the U.S. Congress and Governors – conservativeusa.org/
- U.S. Constitution Online – usconstitution.net/
Note: Above picture (s) found on the web