How many lies will have Obama told in his first debate with Romney?

Will Obama have been green with envy (during the first debate) with Romney who actually does have a half-ways decent political record to stand on?

Given our White House occupier’s political record, the first 2012 presidential debate with GOP candidate Mitt Romney, will have never been a question of Obama (again) lying to the American people; but rather a question of:

“How many lies did Obama weave and spin; and how many of those lies will he have expected voters to believe.”

Following are some significant informational links which highlight Obama’s continued habit of incessant lying:

Obama’s huge religious lie –

Also related – Some of Obama’s other big-time lies:

Also – Please see:

Liars go to hell –



Posted by:  Nathan M. Bickel


Please note for future voting consideration reference:


Note:  Above picture (s) found on the web

12 thoughts on “How many lies will have Obama told in his first debate with Romney?

  1. Bill says:

    It was not President Obama that lied during the first debate, rather it was Romney who lied from start to finish. The President was too much of a nice guy to call him on most of those Romney lies, and that was a mistake on the President’s part. It is very likely a mistake that he will not make from this point forward.

    1. Bill –

      Thank you for your comment and for visiting

      I’m curious. Did you read the whole blog posting and access the highlighted article about Obama’s dozen lies during the debate? The blog posting was about Obama’s lies; not about any misstatements that Romney may have made.

      I think that there are too many media people drinking Obama’s tainted Kool Aid and too many voters sucked in by their propaganda lies about Obama. And, I think that you may be one of them. Romney is not perfect by any means, as no politician is; but, he is a far better choice than the serial liar we now have in the White House. Check out the following short utube of more of Obama’s egregious lies:

      STUNNER! Iftar Dinner Lies – Obama Butchers The Truth – Bolsters Muslim Brotherhood

      1. Sara Ruth says:

        You are disgusting and a complete hypocrite when your post said, “I think that there are too many media people drinking Obama’s tainted Kool Aid”.

        Obviously your reference is to the poisoned Kool aid is a reference to the Jonestown tragedy and their evil prophet, Jim Jones. How dare you? Your smug, flippant and immoral comment is so hurtful, crude and rude, that it definitely does not belong in the comment line of a publications that claims to be moral or published anywhere else for that matter.

        Let me and Wikepedia give you a little history lesson:
        Jonestown became internationally notorious when, on November 18 of 1978, 918 people died in the settlement as well as in a nearby airstrip and in Georgetown, Guyana’s capital. A total of 909 Temple members died in Jonestown, all but two from apparent cyanide poisoning, in an event termed “revolutionary suicide” by Jones and some members on an audio tape of the event and in prior discussions. This includes over 200 murdered children in addition to the deaths of United States Congressman Leo and Four other Temple members who were massacred at an airstrip as they tried to leave Jonestown.

        Many people are still alive and are still severely traumatized by this event. You and yours must not be included or you would never stoop so low to suggest anyone else meet this fate. You should be ashamed and ask God for forgiveness.

        1. Sara Ruth –

          First of all, thank you for visiting and for submitting a comment. However, I will have to take exception to what you assume. You unfairly accuse me of being a “hypocrite.” How could you possibly know what was in my mind when I penned my comment?

          Secondly, you assume that my use of the phrase “…..drinking Obama’s tainted Kool Aid…..” was with the intentioned remembrance of Jonestown. Whether you will believe me or not – I assure you, my use of the Kool Aid phrase was not. This phrase is often used with reference to Obama and swallowing his lies; hook, line and sinker.

          Thirdly and finally, you make the sanctimonious pronouncement at the end of your comment saying of me:

          “You should be ashamed and ask God for forgiveness.” [Your words]

          Please allow me to offer you some further “schooling:” Please attempt to open your mind. What I offer you now is a portion of a topical message I posted on my “The Christian Message” website. Please, read it and thoughtfully consider it – and access the link and read the whole message:

          “The communication problem which Christians and non Christians share, alike:”


          >>>>>> …… Giving and taking offense

          What is, perhaps, more damaging to human communication is the “giving” and “taking” of offense because reality by either the “sender” or “responder,” is distorted. I like what Dr. Martin Luther stated about the “giving and taking of offense:”

          “An offense is something that is said or done whereby our opinion of God and men is distorted; and an offense is active when I give it, passive when I take (patior) it.” [Luther]

          Obviously people give offense when they needlessly, intentionally and maliciously precipitate some sort of word or action, thereby causing the person to whom their offense is directed, discouragement, discomfort and personal bodily and / or, emotional hurt and harm. But, for purposes of this message, and, its remainder, I will focus on the needless “taking” of offense.

          People become offended by all sorts of reasons, – and, often, needlessly, so! And, consequently, they “think” they have been legitimately sinned against, (when such is not the case). They will then accuse the person to whom they think directed the (supposed) offense, and expect apologies to be forthcoming.

          One of the most common reasons why some people become offended, is, when they second guess the person, who [they think] gave the offense. In our politically charged culture, liberal extremists will often accuse other people of racist remarks, when, in fact, they skew the reality of what is actually said, and take upon themselves the [their] perceived offense. In other words, there is no legitimate offense, but only one that is politically motivated and manufactured, (by liberal extremists and their accomplice liberal mainstream extremist media) so as to further a certain propaganda aim and advantage.

          People give and take offense for all sorts of wrong reasons. Often left out of the communication mix, is that neither person, has at his (or her) disposal, the complete facts of an issue. Nor, can they truly claim to know the intentions and motivations of the person with whom they take exception [to]. Hence, it is easy for both sides in the communication process, to distort reality and to misunderstand one another……. <<<<<<<<<

  2. Johnny big di*k says:

    Could you be anymore of a waste of internet space… You spread hate that is all

    1. Johnny small mind –

      I love to publish these lib type one liner comments. They, like yours show how libs are hard of hearing and also ignore debating and discussing the issues. Can’t you come up with some new lib playbook one liners? I grow weary of hearing the moronic hate card line.

      But, be that as it may – please continue to access – as I believe that there is still hope for you to change your frame of mind, so that you can start thinking more realistically.

      By the way – how much is some big time union or lib paying you to visit sites like mine and cut and paste your one liners? Does your hate card employer supply you with office space; or do you have to pound away at your mother’s computer down her basement?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *