Aug 312012
 

Ann Coulter:  On one of her more outspoken days

Todd Akin, Missouri, abortion and rape – patriotupdate.com/

Excerpt of Ann Coulter’s [Debbie Wasserman Schultz type] illogical and radical thinking:

>>>>>>>>>> ……. Ann Coulter summarizes:

“Republicans are not asking Akin to step aside because they suddenly found someone better. They are asking him to step aside because, by his own volition, he said something monumentally stupid, destroying his own candidacy.”…….. <<<<<<<<<<< – patriotupdate.com/

Moralmatters.org Comments to the above (aforementioned) news commentary:

Is Ann Coulter to the Republicans as Debbie Wasserman Schultz is to the lib Democrats? Is Ann Coulter the Republican equivalent of the Democrat, Debbie Wasserman Schultz?

Think about it for a moment and, I’m not referring to a comparison of political party office ranking. I’m alluding to extremist acting lib, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who is comfortable with a rabid news Network like MSNBC.  That media outlet lends itself to her radical political multicultural mindset. Now, Ann Coulter, on the other hand, loves to represent the Conservative purist ideology. Hence, her schizophrenic support of dumping Conservative Missouri Rep. Todd Akin, reflects that purist holier-than-thou attitude. But what is more troubling is that Coulter and the sanctimonious Karl Roves of the GOP, bow to the extremist cat calls of  libs who cry for Rep Akin to leave the Republican candidate status he won in the primary.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz minus Nancy Pelosi’s duplicate broom

Ask yourself:  Who’s the extremist? Debbie Wasserman Schultz who is (only) being true to her political correctness liberal roots; or, Ann Coulter, who with many Republicans and “Conservative” talk show hosts have fallen over one another to be first in line to politically call for Akin to abandon his Conservative Senatorial race.

Who are the extremists? Who are the radicals? Who are acting in schizophrenic political fashion? Who are the ones being secretly snickered about by the opposition political party?

One thing is sure.  The Republicans had better grow some genuine back bone.  Even if they should be victorious this 2012 presidential election; will they be the political lightweight wimps the media and libs are hoping they will continue to be? Will they keep dancing to the tune of the liberal media and freeze every time liberals call them out, accusing them of politically incorrect behavior?

Finally, who and what is more extreme?  Libs tolerating foul hate mongering and racist MSNBC media personalities (as is expected)? Or, to be politically slain by a (hypocritical) political party in et tu Brute betrayal fashion? And, other questions that are most appropriate to ask:

“Should Republican voters hop skip and jump to sanctimonious Republican ‘election (expert) artists’ who unrealistically expect too much of their fellow Republican Conservatives? Should Republican voters stand idly by when their political leaders and strategists cave to the compromising and political correctness standards of Republican holier-than-thou Ann Coulters and Karl Roves? Does the Republican Party need to be a political party of pacifists, placating the political left?

Related:

Ruthless Republicans shoot their wounded – moralmatters.org/2012/08/26/

MSNBC: Network of bigotry hate mongering and racism – moralmatters.org/2012/08/30/

_______________________________________

 

Please note for future voting consideration reference:

Election Projection – The Battle for Capitol Hill – 2012 Senate – electionprojection.com/2012elections/

The Complete List of Email Addresses and Fax Numbers for the U.S. Congress and Governors – conservativeusa.org/

U.S. Constitution Online – usconstitution.net/

 

Posted by:

Nathan M. Bickel

http://www.thechristianmessage.org/

http://moralmatters.org/

Note:  Above Photos [attributed to] found on the web