Contesting Obama Presidential Eligibility – Birther and Constitutionalist Claims, Continue To be Genuine

Is the Sight of a Cookie Jar a Clear Indication of Cookies, Being in That Jar? – Don’t Look to the Mainstream Media (including FOX) for news and commentary like this:

“Obama Eligibility: Reliability” – “….Birth announcements in Hawaiian newspapers at the time relied only on family telephone calls. And no one ever checked those…..Zullo further told Gallups that his team knew of persons born in California, and adopted in Hawaii, who had Hawaii Certificates of Live Birth. Furthermore, these certificates were in the same registry as persons truly born in Hawaii.

Recall that Marx Panama Barnes/Steve Carter was also born in California and adopted in Hawaii……Saul Alinsky (Rules for Radicals) knew that laughter is the most effective weapon in politics. But a Hawaii birth certificate is not reliable evidence of Hawaiian birth, even under ordinary circumstances. The Barnes/Carter case is the prize example. Mike Zullo and his fellow investigators know of others. So the Obama eligibility question is not a laughing matter anymore.” –

Noteworthy:  Please note at the bottom of the ConservativeNewsandViews article all the coverage over the alleged legitimate Obama “presidency.”


Fox News Is Spreading False Information on the Meaning of a “Natural Born Citizen” – Tuesday, May 1, 2012 – …..Based on the current state of the law as presented by the historical record and our U.S. Supreme Court, putative President Barack Obama (born to a British/Kenyan father in an undetermined location), Senator Marco Rubio (born to Cuban parents in the United States), and Senator Bobby Jindal (born to Indian parents in the United States) are all not “natural born Citizens.” That means that under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, none of them are eligible to be elected President or Vice-President. –

Breaking  News – “ForgeryGate: Why Was This Anti-Obama Eligibility Youtube Channel Terminated?” – Note, especially, the 10 minute mark of the video –

Websites which challenge the alleged legitimate presidency of Obama – Access them at your own risk of reality:

Natural Born Citizen – A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers – A blog to discuss the U.S. Constitution Article II, Section 1, “natural born Citizen” presidential eligibility clause –

Birther –


The Birthers –

Obama Citizenship Facts and Obama Birth Certificate Facts –

The Obama File –

One Nation Under Fraud –

Terrible Truth –

“Why Obama will never show his birth certificate” –

“Why All This Confusion About What Natural Born Citizen Means?” –


To Those who deny the US presidency requirement of “natural born citizen:”

…….The United States Constitution is not a Dictionary. The Fourteenth Amendment did not amend Article II nor did it change what a “natural born Citizen” is. Nor does it mention “natural born Citizen” in it. Why cite 8 USC § 1401?

Supreme Court Cases that Cite “Natural Born Citizen” as One Born on U.S. Soil to Citizen Parents

Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)
Shanks v DuPont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830)
Dred Scott v Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
Minor v Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
United States v Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)………………….. –


Nathan M. Bickel

13 thoughts on “Contesting Obama Presidential Eligibility – Birther and Constitutionalist Claims, Continue To be Genuine

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *